+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Alpha Generating Strategies:A Consideration

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    420

    Default Alpha Generating Strategies:A Consideration

    Investment pros have tried numerous methods to protect
    their clients against the occasionally vicious whims of
    market volatility. They all lead to one rather unconventional
    conclusion: Hedge funds and other alternative investments
    are better suited to generate exceptional returns than
    their more traditional mutual fund progenitors.


    THE ULTIMATE INVESTMENT


    The current state of investment management has a lot more in common with
    the prescribed burns than most professionals would care to admit. In an
    effort to curtail naturally occurring disasters, such as the 1998 Russian rubleinspired
    stock market meltdown or the equally vicious Nasdaq carnage of
    late 2000, investment pros have tried numerous methods of protecting their
    clients against the occasionally vicious whims of market volatility. Much like
    the Forest Service, it remains questionable whether these attempts have
    resulted in any positive consequences.
    Sadly, investment managers have been as unsuccessful in adding value
    during bull markets as they had during bear market periods. As a result,
    actively managed funds have become increasingly correlated to passive
    indices. What solutions are available to those truly committed to producing
    excellent risk-adjusted returns?
    The purpose of this chapter is to describe the components necessary to build
    an actively managed fund capable of generating consistent, market-beating
    returns. In this context, the term “market beating” is defined in two ways:
    1. A return in excess of a broad representation of the U.S. equity market.
    2. A return on par with the U.S. stock market but achieved with less volatility.
    The previous requirements assume that the fund is considered in lieu of
    an investment in the stock market. If the fund is to be used as a diversifier
    in a traditional portfolio, it must be non-correlated with the return of either
    the stock or bond market. The fund should also generate an absolute return
    that is large enough to keep from dragging down the performance of the
    overall portfolio.
    As we shall see, the requirements for building such a fund are vexing.
    Factors at the root of this difficulty include dealing with the issue of idea
    generation, the problems of asset size versus performance, and the question
    of determining which parts of the investment landscape are best suited for
    that most illusive of quarry—tradable market inefficiencies.
    This exercise will lead us to a rather unconventional conclusion: Hedge
    funds and other alternative investments are better suited to generate exceptional
    returns than their more traditional mutual fund progenitors



    A DUBIOUS TRACK RECORD
    Financial gurus have a term for adding value to the investment process: alpha
    (). If the underlying market gains 10 percent for the year and an active manager
    is able to generate a 12 percent return, the alpha is 2 percent. This
    example is much more the exception than the rule: Over the last decade,
    there has been only one year when more than 25 percent of actively managed
    mutual funds beat the S&P 500 Index.
    Of course, this period coincided with the most spectacular bull market
    in history—a point not missed by proponents of active management. Fans
    of the approach claim that it is during periods of tumult that investment pros
    add the most value, perhaps by holding a larger cash position or avoiding
    certain stocks that have such deteriorating fundamentals that the only direction
    possible for their stock’s price is south.
    The year 1998 was the perfect year for evaluating the promise of active
    management to produce attractive returns during periods of declining stock
    prices and increased market volatility. Instead of the broad market advances
    that made indexed funds the investment of choice in the last decade, 1998
    proved to be a year in which a select handful of stocks performed spectacularly
    enough to take the market indices to new highs. According to Morgan
    Stanley equity analyst Leah Modigliani, 14 companies accounted for 99 percent
    of the S&P 500 Index’s returns for the first three-quarters of the year.
    Moreover, just a handful of stocks made up the gains in the S&P in the fourth
    quarter of 1998, and two stocks alone—high-fliers Microsoft and Dell
    Computer—produced one-third of the year’s gains.
    Thus, 1998 should have been a stock picker’s dream—an environment
    where a portfolio consisting of a selected few issues would have trounced
    the returns of the overall market. So how did active managers fare?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    420

    Thumbs up Alternative Investments

    FULLY REFLECTED


    Investment managers use a variety of methods in their attempt to generate
    outsized returns. The most common method is the use of company fundamentals
    in discerning the fair value of a firm. This style of investing was inaugurated
    in 1934, when the landmark text Security Analysis, by Benjamin
    Graham and David Dodd, was published. According to this text, securities
    that trade below their fair value can be purchased and later sold for a profit
    as prices are eventually corrected by the marketplace to reflect a company’s
    true financial performance.
    Like many great ideas, fundamental analysis is much easier to perform
    on paper than it is in the real world. This is partly due to the large herd of
    investment professionals who use the method to manage billions of dollars
    in client assets. The resulting plethora of suspender-clad fund pros chasing
    the few incorrectly priced stocks that boast enough trading volume to buy
    and sell in large chunks makes a difficult game nearly impossible to win.
    This simple fact has not stopped the throngs of Ivy League MBAs from
    trying. There are some winners, but so few have generated consistently outstanding
    results that the term “random walk” starts to rear its ugly head.
    Curiously, the group most enamored with fundamental analysis is its
    biggest customer. Institutional investors seem absolutely giddy about discussing
    various fundamentally-based methodologies with investment management
    candidates. Yet, it seems that this fundamental fetish shared by
    many big-time consumers of investment advice is a response to the bad reputation
    of the other school of investment philosophy: technical analysis.
    Market technicians believe that all of the information necessary to make
    a valid buy or sell decision is contained in the price of the security in ques-
    tion. As a result, an examination of sales growth, profit margins, or other
    company-specific metrics is deemed to be unnecessary for predicting stock
    price movement. A cursory examination of price trends, trading volume, and
    other market indicators is all that is necessary, proponents of the approach
    argue.
    Even though security prices have an occasional tendency to move in
    trends, the financial witchcraft associated with technical analysis is anathema
    to the gatekeepers of pension assets and other sizable pools of money.
    Perhaps my investment manager is not keeping up with the market indices,
    these investors seem to be thinking, but at least they are not reading price
    charts.
    Fortunately for technicians, there is about as much academic evidence
    supporting the use of price charts as there is touting the scrutiny of a firm’s
    financial statements. Unfortunately, this evidence amounts to a molehill compared
    to the mountains of data that suggest the market-beating potential of
    human intervention in the capital markets—regardless of the approach used
    —is close to nil.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
www.vbulletin.com